What did critics think of M. Knight Shamaran’s thriller?

Thomasin McKenzie and Alex Wolff appear in M. Night Shyamalan’s “Old”.


Critics say M. Night Shyamalan’s latest film, “Old,” isn’t lacking in conspiracy and suspense, but hasn’t caught up with the director’s previous film.

His latest thriller follows a family of four, Guy (Gael Garcia Bernal), Prisca (Vicky Krieps) and their children, Maddox (11) and Trent (6) during a tropical vacation. doing. The family set foot on a secluded beach at the suggestion of the resort manager, but soon realized that idyllic places were somehow rapidly aging them.

The beach is also visited by rappers, midsize sedans, surgeon Charles and his wife Crystal’s family, young daughter Kara and mother Agnes, and couple Jarin and Patricia. In addition to fear, there is the fact that when they try to leave the area, the group experiences headaches that induce severe power outages.

Critics agreed that “Old” is not Shyamalan’s best work, but far from his worst. The director became famous for his shocking plot twists and surprising endings from genius (“sixth sense”) to asinin (“happening”). “Old” seems to be in the middle.

Universal Film currently holds a 55% “Rotten” score on Rotten Tomatoes from 153 reviews. Here’s what critics thought of Shyamalan’s “old” prior to Friday’s debut:

Peter Travers, ABC News

The “old” premise is fascinating, Peter Travers wrote in a movie review on ABC News. The problem is that once it gets you hooked, it’s hard to get your attention during its execution time.

“This suspense thriller, shot with the poet’s eyes and tin ears for dialogue, provokes a provocation that Shyamalan lacks the ability to develop much less sustain,” Travers said.

“Old” is based on a graphic novel called “Sandcastle” that follows the same premise, but unleashes the mystery of a supernatural beach. Shyamalan added his own account of the bizarre event in adapting the material.

While some critics felt that the release (not spoiled here) was a harmless addition to the parable, others like Travers were “imperfect” in concept and film. I felt that I had lost.

“You’re leaving the’old’and wondering how a great premise can end up with such a failed job,” Travers wrote.

Read the full review from ABC News.

Rufus Sewell from M. Night Shyamalan’s “Old”.


Robert Daniels, IGN

Critics like IGN’s Robert Daniels quickly pointed out how beautiful the “old” was filmed. Daniels praised cinematographer Mike Joruakis for his creativity in capturing horror on screen. He said the aging effect and make-up were also well achieved by the special effects team.

However, he wrote that the formal conversations and tedious explanations in the character’s conversation left a lot of demand.

“‘Old’ works best when we focus on the horrors of young people who have experienced age devastation long before the times,” Daniels wrote in his review. “A powerful performance from the entire cast hides perhaps the worst and most rhythmically incredible dialogue of M. Night Shyamalan’s career, except for his miserable live-action Avatar: The Last Airbender. Was successful. “

He wrote that much of the description of “ham fist” should be left as a mystery.

“Nevertheless,’Old’ is as profound as Shyamalan’s thriller,” Daniels said. “It’s probably not worth watching repeatedly, but the first movie is a suggestive meditation about the meaning of life, creating dark, buried emotions like water kissing the sand.”

Read the full review from IGN.

Todd Gilchrist, The Wrap

Dialogue wasn’t the only flaw critic pointed out in the Old review. Todd Gilchrist of The Wrap said the characters in the film “feel like they were designed by some algorithm in a screenwriting program.”

“Some of the ensembles left behind on the beach are museum curators, actuaries, thoracic surgeons, nurses and psychologists. Shyamalan is not only assembled with mechanical precision, but named after each profession. But it may have been, but through the expertise they provide, it filters all situations in the story and guarantees a spout of comical explanations every time to assess how or why the situation has changed. I will, “he wrote in a movie review.

Actuaries make many boring numbers of calculations, psychologists encourage others to talk about their emotions, and characters react to situations in strange and unrealistic ways. Many critics said that if these characters were more fleshed out, the audience might have been more emotionally invested in their life-and-death plight.

“As is more and more in his films, Shyamalan is so absorbed in the mechanics of his ideas that we only need to care if they make remote identifiable choices. , Or you can’t give them a sniff test before unleashing them on the characters you care about, “Gilchrist said.

Read the full review of The Wrap.

Thomasin McKenzie and Gael Garcia Bernal appear in M. Night Shyamalan’s “Old”.


Adam Graham, The Detroit News

Like many critics, Detroit News’ Adam Graham said that “Old” is one of Shyamalan’s finest films, but not as good as previous successes like “The Sixth Sense” and “Sign.” Stated.

“The problem is, well, Shyamalan over-exercising himself with flashy camerawork and ruining the mood he creates with his clunky writing,” he wrote in his review. “Every time you come in, he pulls you back.”

Graham also found the ending to be overwhelming, saying, “It’s hard to make a fuss when the audience is trained to know they’re coming down the pike.”

Read the full review from The Detroit News.

Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of CNBC and NBC Universal. NBCUniversal owns Rotten Tomatoes and is a distributor of “Old”.

What did critics think of M. Knight Shamaran’s thriller?

Source link What did critics think of M. Knight Shamaran’s thriller?

Back to top button