Attorney General Merrick Garland said on Monday in the aftermath of a gag order imposed while the Trump administration’s Justice Department was working to seize a national security reporter’s email, CNN, New York Times, and Washington. I met the top executives of the post.
In a statement, the DOJ called the meeting a “productive conversation,” and media executives and Garland “agree with the need for strong and lasting rules.”
The Justice Department also said in a discussion that the reporter was neither the subject of a recent investigation nor the subject of a recent investigation, the statement said.
Bruce Brown, Executive Director of the Press Commission for Freedom of the Press, said executives were “encouraged” by the meeting and “very frankly told DOJ leadership what the existential crisis was for these organizations. “.
In addition to journalists from well-known organizations, many lawmakers were targeted during the Trump administration’s investigation into a leak of sensitive information, according to recent news reports.
Democratic representatives Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell learned last week that the Justice Department obtained metadata from Apple in 2018 as part of cracking down on leaks and other national security issues in a Russian investigation. it was done.
U.S. Department of Justice Investigates Secret Seizure of House Democratic Data
The Justice Department seized metadata from Apple in 2018 for members of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff and Erics Walwell.
According to Insider’s news website, Trump-era Attorney General Jeff Sessions and William Barr and former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein all said they were unaware of subpoenas for Democrats.
Earlier on Monday, Garland issued a statement condemning those attempts, stating that the “important question” had to be resolved as to what had happened.
“In response, I have instructed the Inspector General to refer to this issue and I am completely confident that he will carry out a thorough and independent investigation,” the statement read.
Mr. Schiff, chairman of the US House of Representatives intelligence committee, issued a statement after discussing with Garland on Monday, saying he was confident that the current Attorney General would properly investigate.
“It is also important for Congress to carry out its own oversight and ensure that the Department of Justice is never used to protect the president’s friends and accomplices, or as a potential weapon against the president’s recognized political enemies.” Said Mr. Schiff.
But this week, journalists said a statement of support for free coverage from the Biden administration would make little sense without codified protection.
“President Biden said the seizure of reporters’ records would be suspended under his administration, but with respect to him and his expressed intentions, it is a promise of limited relevance,” National Security said. Reporter Barbara Star wrote in an editorial. CNN. During the Trump administration, the star’s email was summoned without her knowledge.
“Unless new protections are codified, this can happen again to all journalists,” she wrote, and she added that she was “feared” of what happened.
Also on Monday, media outlets reported that John Demers, head of the DOJ’s national security department, is expected to resign by the weekend.
New York Times “An official confirmed by the Trump administration to stay in the Senate for the longest time in the Senate during President Biden’s time,” Demars said this summer, even before the controversy over the leak investigation was revealed this month. He reported that he was expected to leave the Justice Department.
Broadcaster CNN reported this week that its Supreme Lawyer received a gag order in 2020. It was when the DOJ under the Attorney General Bar at the time asked for an email record of a National Security correspondent.
The New York Times and The Washington Post received similar orders and recently reported on DOJ’s efforts to seize journalist records as part of an investigation into material breaches in recent weeks. The Times reported that the agency searched the reporter’s email log to determine the source of the reporter.
Media experts and lawyers have blamed the Justice Department’s actions.
“Very aggressive” gag order in media subpoena case, lawyer says
Prominent U.S. media say the Justice Department imposed a gag order on lawyers and executives while submitting records from national security reporters.
Under DOJ guidelines, the Attorney General must approve subpoenas for reporters’ records, and seizure of news records should be treated as “special measures, not standard investigative practices.”
The guidelines “present the risk of serious national security harm, or the imminent risk of death or serious physical harm, where such notice poses a clear and substantive threat to the integrity of the investigation.” Unless in some cases, it states that journalists or outlets need to be notified.
In the cases revealed in recent weeks, no store was informed about the request for a subpoena, and two were subject to the Gag Order.
U.S. Attorney General meets with media executives over leak probe | Voice of America
Source link U.S. Attorney General meets with media executives over leak probe | Voice of America