Former President Donald Trump has filed three proceedings in Florida courts against CEOs of Facebook, Google, Twitter, and companies, and has asked judges to effectively dismiss Article 230 of the Communications Decency Act. I’m looking for. For years, Section 230 has been used to protect websites from proceedings by not being responsible for what users post or delete.
The proceedings allege that the company infringed Trump’s First Amendment rights forbidden Following an attack on Congress by his heavily armed followers, he from their social media platform earlier this year.
Each is a private company, but the lawsuit claims that, due to its size and cooperation with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic, the company has “grown beyond private companies into a state-based company.” .. A lawsuit has been filed against Google because Google owns YouTube. It also banned Trump following an attack on the Capitol in January.
Trump announced a proceeding during a press conference at his golf course in New Jersey I started raising funds immediately It continues greatly to the event.
The proceedings faced severe criticism from legal experts who found many mistakes in the proceedings and said they were unlikely to go far in court.
Kenesa Ahmad, a lawyer and partner at consulting firm Aleada, said the proceedings from conservative leaders, who repeatedly claimed that companies “have the right to deny service to anyone,” are particularly strange. It was.
“Conservative legal theory is to serve people to not wear shoes, to bake cakes for two married men, or to limit access to golf clubs based on race. Established the ability to refuse, “said Ahmad.
“But the former president is complaining about private companies denying him the platform he used to foster violence and coup attempts? The court has been talking about this for a long time. . “
Over the years, courts have routinely ruled in favor of Section 230 protection, and engineers often refer to this rule as the “backbone” of the Internet.
Anurag Lal, CEO of NetSfere and former director of the FCC’s U.S. Broadband Task Force under the Obama administration, said that platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube are within the full right to deny users under certain conditions. He said he revealed that it was in. Broken use.
“From a business perspective, I don’t think the proceedings will be successful. Users opt in at sign-up and cannot force companies to counter these rules and regulations. In this case, former President Trump said It violated the rules and is currently addressing the consequences of these actions. ”
Evan Greer, director of the advocacy group Fight For The Future, called the proceedings a “funding gap” and explained that the First Amendment would allow private platforms to make the kind of moderation decisions they want to make as non-governmental agencies. ..
Greer said it was dishonest for Trump to attack Section 230. Because without the rules, the platform “would have eliminated controversial figures like Trump long ago.”
“His false allegations raise legitimate concerns about confusion and neglect of how unplanned or excessive content moderation can lead to content deletion and often disproportionately affect marginalized communities. It just creates, “Glia said.
“Technology companies make content moderation decisions based on self-preservation rather than principles. As a result, more powerful people have a big impact on moderation decisions. The former president’s ban on social media is what he says. He may have excluded himself, but he didn’t change the dynamics of social media that helped him get there in the first place. “
Trump is targeting Section 230 in proceedings against Facebook, Twitter and Google
Source link Trump is targeting Section 230 in proceedings against Facebook, Twitter and Google