Texas

The health effects of canceling Roe v. Wade

The Supreme Court on Friday followed the draft ruling that leaked to the media last month in its annulment Roe against Wadethe nearly 50-year sentence that established the constitutional right to abortion.

The ruling puts an end to federal protection of abortion care rights and will no doubt have lasting effects on access to health care and medical education across the country.

With Friday’s Supreme Court ruling defending a Mississippi law banning almost all abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, a pregnant person’s ability to have an abortion now depends on the state in which she lives.

As a result of the Supreme Court decision, it is likely that 26 states will move toward banning abortion. Thirteen of those states already have so-called “trigger laws” in place: laws banning abortions will go into effect once Eggs was overturned.

Access to abortion care is already severely restricted in these states, and about 62% of women in the United States live within 10 miles of an abortion clinic.

According to research from the University of Utah, that percentage drops to about 40% of women who live within 10 miles of a clinic once these bans go into effect.

Researchers say nearly half of U.S. women.

The areas where pregnant people will feel the most impact are in the deep south, the Midwest and the west between mountains. It is estimated that residents could experience a 100-fold increase in distance to abortion services in those areas.

Women of color, who already have disproportionately limited access to health care, are expected to travel even further for abortion care.

Experts say this would lead to a further widening of economic and health disparities between ethnic groups and between the rich and those with fewer resources.

Another impact that is often overlooked in the sentence is how it could affect the workforce that pays attention to abortion. UCLA researchers say 45% of residency programs in obstetrics / gynecology are in states likely to implement bans. it is unknown how today’s decision will affect access to training in those states.

“As current providers, either abandoning the workforce altogether or abandoning abortion care, those are the providers who have to train tomorrow’s providers,” Dr. Julia Strasser, a senior research scientist at the University of California, told Spectrum News. George Washington.

According to Dr. Strasser, it is an effect that will have lasting wave effects in the medical field.

“The next generation of suppliers will not receive proper education and training in those areas. So you have people who have a kind of leak-free bucket now where people leave the workforce and then you also have the leaky pipeline, where people are abandon throughout their training and future workforce, ”says Dr. . Strasser.

Experts say the decision will likely increase the use of abortion by drugs, also known as the “abortion pill.”

There are several organizations that offer these pills through online or telehealth services.

These “abortion pills” are recommended for use until 10 weeks of pregnancy. It is not a recommended option for women past 15 weeks of pregnancy.

Abortion care options will remain severely restricted for women living in states that prohibit abortion. Experts say we will see more women travel through state lines to access care.

And while the country is reacting to today’s ruling, experts say what is also desperately needed right now is expanding access to contraceptives and advising women on how to use those contraceptives.

The health effects of canceling Roe v. Wade

Source link The health effects of canceling Roe v. Wade

Back to top button