Senior government ministers often used private mail services to make important government decisions and then did not delete messages, the court heard.
The prime minister and other members of the Cabinet used personal WhatsApp accounts to communicate “critical decisions”, related to Covid-19 disease, according to reports filed on the website. Type of high court case taken by All the Citizens advertising company, Foxglove. and the Good Law Project which protested against the government’s use of fixed cell phones.
The groups said the government was breaking the law by using unofficial means to conduct official business. In a statement heard by the court Tuesday, Sarah Harrison, chief of staff for the ministry’s office, said officers used personal devices on a daily basis.
Harrison told the Supreme Court: “In April 2021, as a result of a security announcement, the prime minister implemented security warnings regarding a mobile app. history message for searching and the phone does not work.
The Good Law Project said it would have “significant implications for the detection and detention of the prime minister and his government”, citing its impact on the ongoing Partygate crisis and a question. coming of the disease.
The Supreme Court also heard that there were “too many times” of discussions about important decisions being made on WhatsApp and email services – and then being wiped out illegally.
The lead released by the Good Law Project as part of its legal action against the use of mobile phones in the government makes it clear that “ministers should not use the rights. personal emails, personal emails or personal applications to conduct public business ”.
In a statement published today, the Institute for Government said some ministers and special advisers in various agencies have chosen to use their business phones only for government purposes or not. ” right ”their co -workers don’t work the same.
The idea said the agencies should operate WhatsApp in a more efficient way that is accessible to all relevant people and not used to make specific decisions.
It is said that agencies also need to ensure that WhatsApp messages are kept for a long time and that the use of the messaging service does not interfere with viewing or viewing, call measures to be taken “to address weak and inconsistent processes for finding programs, or sending messages to government systems. for maintenance”.
“By taking these procedures, and communicating and implementing them in the offices, the government will be better able to reap the benefits of WhatsApp and reduce the risks to have a fair and transparent government, ”IfG said.
The idea added that WhatsApp has improved government communications in a number of ways, allowing officials direct access to ministers and the ease of non -governmental conversations.
But he said when memoir programs made bad decisions made without full knowledge, he called it the “best way to decide”.
The Good Law Project said the use of personal resources was a threat to national security, making it difficult for the government to implement Freedom of Information demands and the right to justice demanded by councils and ministers can be held.
A spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: “There are proper arrangements and guidelines in place for keeping emails, including emails. Like all guides, we will take care of this. under constant review. of communication channels. “
The ministry said it would not comment on the complaint.
The court heard the ministers make major decisions on WhatsApp and then delete the messages
Source link The court heard the ministers make major decisions on WhatsApp and then delete the messages