Texas House Democrats vie with Congressional Republicans over their protest against the state’s voting bill

Sign up for The Brief. This is a daily newsletter that keeps readers informed of the most important Texas news.

Congressional Texas Republicans delve into the expertise of the voter restriction bill sitting back in Austin on Thursday, slamming Texas House Democrats in a tense four-hour parliamentary subcommittee, sometimes bubbling with angry accusations. accept.

US Congressman Pat Fallon, a freshman Republican from Sherman, was particularly excited. At one point, he accused Fort Worth Democrat Nicole Collier of calling his Republican colleagues racists.


She didn’t say her colleague was racist, Collier said. “They are not informed.”

Collier was one of three Texas House Democrats who testified before the Civil Rights and Civil Freedom Subcommittee. She and her colleagues, Senfronia Thompson of Houston and Diego Bernal of San Antonio, were similarly questioned by Democratic and Republican members. He explained and defended their decision to flee to the capital of the country and put a special session on the Texas State Parliament on hold.

Democrats have used camps in Washington to draw public attention to the ongoing voting situation in Texas and have called for federal law that could anticipate state efforts.

In his opening remarks, Maryland Democrat Jamie Ruskin, chairman of the subcommittee, said that Texas Parliamentary Bill 3 and Senate Bill 1 “probably the most aggressive set of voting restrictions in the country. “, And said it was a” radical election. ” overhaul. “


He concluded his statement “before it was too late” by asking Congress to pass a radical federal voting bill known as the People’s Law and the John Lewis Voting Rights Promotion Act.

The hearing followed a series of meetings between Texas Democrats and the country’s most influential Democrats. However, the For The People Act has stagnated due to filibusters backed by Republicans and Democratic senators such as Kyrsten Cinema in Arizona and Joe Manchin in West Virginia.

Both of these laws, if passed, restore aspects of the Voting Rights Act that were withdrawn by the US Supreme Court in 2013. In particular, the bill will revive the federal pre-permit of voting law, which gives the federal government the right to vote. State law that can lead to discrimination against voters.

Other aspects of the For the People Act include curbing partisan gerrymandering, creating national automatic voter registration, and allowing unidentified voters to vote in statements that have sworn their identities. ..


One of the members of the state legislature has joined the four Texas state legislature Republicans who attended the hearing. Republican Parliamentarian Travis Claddy said the Democratic Party had misrepresented the impact of the bill and rejected the idea of ​​restricting access to votes to “correct the record” in the Texas bill. Showed the de facto appearance of.

Mr Claddy said the strike would not have happened if a Democratic colleague offered to improve the bill simply through “discussion and deliberation.”

“It’s time to go home. Enough, you have your fun,” he said.

However, Collier pointed out the amendment rejected by Republicans in the House of Representatives, saying that more people opposed the bill than supported it.

“Our back was hitting a wall,” she said.

Nina Perales, vice president of litigation for the Mexican-American Legal and Defense Education Fund, an organization that has been at the forefront of voting rights issues in Texas for decades, also testified.


“The Texas bill has led to the threat of voters by poll observers,” she said, challenging Claddy’s allegations. “Section 3 of SB1 and Section 4 of HB3 remove voters from polling place privacy and security protection and call for vigilantism by polling place observers.

“Texas has a long and well-documented history of discrimination that has touched on the right of African Americans and Hispanics to vote or participate in the election process,” she said in federal court. Mentioned many cases that held it. Texas law discriminated against voters.

US Congressman Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, D-New York, asked Thompson if the proposed restrictions would feel like a resurgence of the Jim Crow era. Thompson said so.

Democrats were enthusiastic about their decision to leave Texas.

“Well, do each of your three know that you’re actually violating Texas law by being here instead of being in Texas during the legislative session? And that’s it? Is it to arrest you in Texas? “I asked Republican Rep. Chiproy.


“I’m ready to be arrested,” Thompson argued. “I do not violate the law and represent the members.”

“I don’t know if these laws are constitutional,” Bernal added.

A particularly long and enthusiastic exchange took place between Fallon and Collier after asking her to clarify why she felt the Texas bill could affect voters.

“It will have different effects on people of color,” Collier replied.

“Okay, that’s your view,” Fallon said.

Finally, Bernal thanked the subcommittee for allowing him and his colleagues to speak, but admitted that little was achieved.

“It’s important to point out that we’ve exchanged a lot of compliments here, but we didn’t have to discuss the actual components of the bill,” he said. “We can talk back and forth about this kind of hashtag messaging, but we don’t have a rough discussion of the bill, because people think we’re right.”


Join us at the 2021 Texas Tribune Festival from September 20th to 25th. Tickets for this few days of celebration of politics, public policy, and bold ideas about the news of the day, curated by Texas Tribune award-winning journalists, are now on sale. learn more.

Texas House Democrats vie with Congressional Republicans over their protest against the state’s voting bill

Source link Texas House Democrats vie with Congressional Republicans over their protest against the state’s voting bill

Back to top button