The US Supreme Court has allowed Texas law, which temporarily bans most abortions, to remain in force temporarily, but will be heard on November 1. A law known as Senate Bill 8 prohibits this procedure about 6 weeks after pregnancy or before most women know that they are pregnant.
The judge said the federal government would decide whether it had the right to sue the law. For the time being, court proceedings have remained unchanged, with abortion cuts by 80% in the second largest state in the United States, according to a Texas clinic.
The conservative majority of the court’s refusal to block the law while oral arguments were being prepared is liberal, calling the decision to six million women of reproductive age in Texas “calm comfort.” Condemned by Sonia Sotomayor of Justice.
“The court has the right to schedule an application for this discussion, recognizing the public importance of the issues raised in these proceedings,” Sotomayor wrote. “But future arbitrage promises provide calm comfort to Texas women seeking abortion treatment.”
In Texas, SB8 has been in effect since September, with the exception of a 48-hour district court order suspension. When heart activity is detected, abortion is usually banned for about 6 weeks.
Courts have blocked other state laws that effectively ban abortion before the foetation can survive outside the womb, but Texas law leaves enforcement to civilians, so it has the same fate as before. I have avoided. Bounty hunter.
The law allows anyone to file proceedings with anyone helping women to have an abortion, and fines $ 10,000 for defendants found to be in violation of the law. I have. If the defendant wins the case in court, nothing can be regained.
The Biden administration warned the Supreme Court that none of the decisions would be safe if it allowed Texas law to come into force at the final stage of blocking Texas’s ban on most abortions.
If the law remains in force, “this court’s decision is not safe. States do not have to follow precedents they disagree with, or even disagree. They simply exercise the rights they dislike. It may be outlawed. “
What was enforced by other states banning abortion before the time when the foetation could survive outside the womb was blocked by the court because it contradicted the Supreme Court’s case.
“Texas shouldn’t get different results simply by combining unconstitutionality with an unprecedented enforcement scheme designed to circumvent the traditional mechanism of judicial review,” the government wrote.
The day before, the state said the federal government lacked the power to file a proceeding to challenge Texas’ ban and asked the court to leave the law in place.
The Justice Department filed a lawsuit after the Supreme Court refused previous efforts to temporarily suspend the measures taken by the abortion provider.
In early October, Judge Robert Pittman of the US District Court ruled the administration, put the law on hold, and allowed abortion to resume. Two days later, three judges from the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals enforced the law.
Texas opposed the Supreme Court’s early review, but said the proceedings should be used to directly dismiss Law and Casey’s decisions if the judge agrees with the Biden administration’s request. ..
The Supreme Court challenges Mississippi’s 15-week ban on abortion and hears arguably the most important proceedings in decades, the Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which will be tried on December 1. intend to do something.
The Dobbs case is a groundbreaking 1973 case of Roe v. Wade, which is generally considered to be 24 weeks gestation and has nationally legalized abortion until the foetation can survive outside the womb. It is considered a direct challenge. This decision has protected the right to abortion for nearly 50 years. This includes hostile nations that have worked diligently to make procedures illegal within their borders.
Supreme Court refuses to block Texas abortion ban, but you’ll hear the challenge | US Supreme Court
Source link Supreme Court refuses to block Texas abortion ban, but you’ll hear the challenge | US Supreme Court