Proponents welcome the Taliban decree banning forced marriage, but demand more

File Photo: Roya Rahmani, Ambassador to the United States of Afghanistan, will speak in an interview with Reuters in Washington, DC, February 8, 2019.Reuters / Joshua Roberts / File Photos

December 3, 2021

Charlotte Greenfield

ISLAMABAD (Reuters) – The Taliban’s decree banning forced marriage is a major step forward, as two major Afghan women said on Friday, but hard-line Muslim groups are women on work and education. The question remained as to whether to expand the rights of the Taliban.

The Taliban government in Afghanistan released a decree on Friday stating that women should not be considered “property” and must agree to marry.

Mahbouba Seraj, Secretary-General of the Center for Women’s Skills Development in Afghanistan, said: Speak from Kabul at the Reuters Next Conference Panel on Friday.

The international community, which has frozen billions of dollars for Afghanistan, has made women and human rights an important element of future involvement with Afghanistan.

Seraji said Afghan politicians had a hard time formulating such a clear policy on women’s rights to marriage, even before the Taliban occupied the country on August 15.

“Now, as women in this country, all we have to do is make sure this is actually done and done,” says Seraji, a shelter for vulnerable women. I did.

Former Afghan ambassador to the United States, Roya Rahmani, reiterated her optimism and could be an attempt to ease international concerns about the group’s performance on women’s rights as the Taliban administration seeks funding. He added that it was expensive.

“It would be amazing if that were done,” Rahmani told the Reuters Next Panel, and it would be important to add details such as who would prevent the girl’s consent from being enforced by the family.

“It’s a very wise move on the Taliban side at this point, because one of the hottest news in the West is that little girls are sold to others as property to feed the rest of the family. The fact is that, “she said.


Earlier rules from 1996 to 2001 banned women from leaving home without covering their faces and heads with their male relatives, banned girls from being educated, and made men bearded. , Banned playing music.

The group says they have changed, but many women, supporters and officials are still skeptical.

The international government freezes billions of dollars in central bank reserves, cuts off development funding for Afghanistan, jeopardizes aid-dependent economies, and warns economists and aid groups of a humanitarian catastrophe. I was allowed to.

Seraji said the Taliban needed to go further and asked group spokesman Zabifra Mujahid to publish more rules to clarify women’s right to access public spaces. ..

“What I’m really waiting to hear from the same group, the same person, is that he sends a decree on education and labor rights for Afghan women. It’s absolutely amazing,” she said. Told.

Also at the panel, Afghanistan’s founder and director of the State Institute for Music Research, Ahmad Salmast, warned that the Taliban showed little sign of change when it came to recognizing freedom of art and expression.

Tullivan closed his institute and other music and art departments in the country when he made it easier for hundreds of students and their families to flee the country and flee to Portugal.

The group did not announce their policy on music, but said he had hidden their instruments and was in contact with many Afghan musicians who lived in fear.

“There is no official decree banning music or music education, but the practice is here,” he said. “Music has disappeared from the air of Afghanistan.”

(Report by Charlotte Greenfield and Rupam Jain, edited by Alison Williams)

Proponents welcome the Taliban decree banning forced marriage, but demand more

Source link Proponents welcome the Taliban decree banning forced marriage, but demand more

Back to top button