Texas

Norman Baker: Charles cannot hide behind his aide.His fingerprints are everywhere in this mess

Cash for access. Life Peer of the United States Corruption. And even cash for citizenship.

An email about Sunday’s devastating revelation about Prince Charles and his advisers (including Michael Fawcett on his right arm) will shock many.

But the real surprise is that their activities have been hidden from public for quite some time.

This is not a one-time event.

It’s a pattern of behavior.

It has long been a common practice for Charles to receive cash on behalf of a charity in return for his favor.

An email about Sunday’s devastating revelation about Prince Charles and his adviser (including Michael Fawcett (right) on his right arm) will shock many. But the real surprise is that their activities have been hidden from public for quite some time.

Yes, the cause that Prince of Wales defends is worth it.

In particular, The Prince’s Trust, founded in 1976, has been extremely successful and has helped nearly one million young people.

The Dunfreeze House, which he decided to save for the country, is a valuable and often pioneering work.

Still, Charles doesn’t notice or perhaps care about large checks approaching because donors want to get something back for them, and checks from almost everyone. It repeatedly shows that it is willing to accept.

His own father, Prince Phillip, once described Charles as “royal rent.”

And the larger the total, the more shaded the donor.

For example, Enron’s founder, Kenneth Lay, was a regular customer of St. James’s Palace. Occasionally Ray gave back and Charles flew to Houston to have lunch with him.

Enron donated approximately £ 1 million to Princestrast between 1991 and 1999. But that was before it became clear that Enron had tampered with the book in a catastrophic bankruptcy that ruined countless lives.

And what about Ruben Vardanyan, CEO of the Moscow bank Troika Dialog?

The bank ran a tax haven shell company in the British Virgin Islands called the Quantus Division.

Through Quantus, £ 200,000 was sent to Charles to help fill a big financial hole in Dumphries House.

Still, Charles doesn't notice or perhaps care about large checks approaching because donors want to get something back for them, and checks from almost everyone. It repeatedly shows that it is willing to accept.

Still, Charles doesn’t notice or perhaps care about large checks approaching because donors want to get something back for them, and checks from almost everyone. It repeatedly shows that it is willing to accept.

Bankers were able to raise an additional £ 1.5m from a Russian businessman who was legitimately rewarded by Charles at a black tie dinner in 2014.

There is no doubt that Vladimir Putin was pleased with this top-level, unscrutinized access to the UK facility.

Charles seems to think that if the cause is justified and the money is invested, nothing else is important. It’s also a stinking attitude of arrogance, vanity, and perhaps naivety.

In the 1990s, the Tory government was shaken by a “cash for questions” scandal.

The allegations that two conservative lawmakers were paid to ask congressional questions led to the resignation of one Tim Smith and the defeat of another Neil Hamilton in the 1997 general election. ..

How is this different from Prince Charles selling access to himself for money?

But today’s revelation provided by Michael Fawcett to help Saudi Arabian Sheikh get both a knight and a British passport takes this issue to a whole new level.

Selling honor under the 1925 Honor (Abuse Prevention) Act is a criminal offense. Tomorrow, I will send a letter to the Metropolitan Police Department’s Cressida Dick asking him to start an investigation.

When it comes to helping to get citizenship in exchange for cash, it’s a kind of connection I made clear through a parliamentary response in 2001, forcing Secretary of Commerce Peter Mandelson to resign from the Labor government. it was done.

He intervened in the Interior Ministry on behalf of the Hindu brothers, who had made large donations to the whitest elephant, the Millennium Dome.

How is this different from Charles, who raises money at Dunfries House in return for his citizenship promise? It is not.

Similarities require unpleasant consideration for successors to the throne. However, if past behavior is a guide, there is little such reflection.

If the story refuses to disappear, Michael Faucette will be forced to resign forever. Then will he be quietly rehired when no one is watching? It has happened before.

But let’s be clear. This is not a fraudulent operation. Mr. Faucette is doing exactly what Prince Charles wants.

And now it’s the Prince of Wales, not Michael Faucette, who has to answer the question. His royal fingerprints are on all of this.

The monarchy was severely damaged by the dangerous activities of the stupid Prince Andrew and the bleeding of Harry and Megan’s self-attachment.

The Queen continues to be respected, but she does not last forever.

This morning, many will ask themselves how Prince Charles can square such actions with the grave responsibilities he is supposed to inherit someday.

l … and what do you do?What Norman Baker’s royal family doesn’t want you to know is published by Biteback

Norman Baker: Charles cannot hide behind his aide.His fingerprints are everywhere in this mess

Source link Norman Baker: Charles cannot hide behind his aide.His fingerprints are everywhere in this mess

Back to top button