According to the site’s co-founder, the online encyclopedia has been cut out by left-wing volunteers to provide balance, making Wikipedia unreliable as an unbiased source of information.
Larry Sanger, 52, who co-founded Wikipedia with Jimmy Wales in 2001, said the crowdsourcing project betrayed its original mission by reflecting its “founding” view.
He agrees that a “team of democratic volunteers” will remove content that they don’t like, including information about scandals related to President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden. Said he did.
When asked by Unherd.com if he could trust Wikipedia, he replied:
According to the site’s co-founder Larry Sanger (above), Wikipedia has become unreliable as an unbiased source of information, as left-wing volunteers have cut out balancing edits in online encyclopedias.
Sanger, 52, who co-founded Wikipedia with Jimmy Wales (seen above in 2017) in 2001, said the crowdsourcing project betrayed its original mission by reflecting its “founding” view. Ta
Mr. Sanger said he agreed with the evaluation that “a team of democratic volunteers” would remove content that didn’t suit their tastes.
“Can you believe that it always gives you the truth? Well, it depends on what you think the truth is.
The DailyMail.com contacted Wikipedia for comment.
Sanger quoted Joe Biden’s entry. He says this is a sanitized version that does not include discussions from a Republican perspective.
“Looking at Biden’s article, there are few concerns Republicans had about him,” Sanger said.
“Therefore, if you need a remote resemblance to the Republican view of Biden, you can’t get it from the article.
“And there’s a paragraph about the Ukrainian scandal-and it’s a pretty long article, so there should be at least a paragraph-.
“Most of them can’t be found on Wikipedia.”
Mr. Sanger added: “What you can hardly find is very biased and can be read like a brief explanation of a lawyer.”
Sanger quoted Joe Biden’s entry.He says this is a sanitized version that does not include discussions from a Republican perspective.
A Wikipedia passage on the issue that Sanger cites as being biased in favor of Biden states: In September 2019, Trump was reported to have pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate alleged misconduct by Biden and his son Hunter Biden.
‘Despite the allegations, as of September 2019, no evidence of fraud by Bidens has been created.
“The media has broadly interpreted this pressure to investigate Biden as trying to undermine Biden’s chances of winning the president, resulting in political scandals and impeachment by the Trump House of Representatives.”
Passage continues:’Since 2019, Trump and his allies appear to have been pursuing an investigation into Burisma Holdings, which hired Hunter Biden, and misrepresented Biden for dismissing Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin. I blamed him. Biden has been accused of withholding $ 1 billion in aid from Ukraine in this effort.
In 2015, Biden pressured the Ukrainian parliament to remove Shokin. This is because the United States, the European Union, and other international organizations have corrupted Shokin and considered it ineffective, especially because Shokin was not actively investigating Burisma.
“The withholding of $ 1 billion in aid was part of this official policy.”
In a blog post, Sanger does not mention the fact that Biden’s entry received $ 600,000 a year to serve on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma from 2014 to 2019. Said.
Hunter Biden has been appointed to the board of directors, despite his lack of experience in the energy sector.
Wikipedia’s Joe Biden entry doesn’t even mention Hunter Biden’s laptop.
The president’s son forgot his 2017 MacBook Pro laptop at a computer repair shop in Wilmington, Delaware in April 2019.
The content of the laptop was released, but Bidens and other Democrats claimed it was part of the “Russian Disinformation Campaign.”
The contents of the laptop have been certified by a cyber forensic expert commissioned by the DailyMail.com.
The laptop was released in October when the New York Post reported an email from Hunter Biden’s laptop and received it from Trump’s private lawyer, Rudy Giuliani.
Social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook did not allow users to share links to posted stories, prompting criticism that they were engaged in censorship motivated by Democratic prejudice. ..
On October 14th, the New York Post posted a top page story under the heading “BIDEN SECRET EMAILS”.
Internally, they published some emails related to the hunter’s commerce in Ukraine and a link to his father. Joe and Hunter Biden denied fraud.
In a blog post, Sanger does not mention the fact that Biden’s entry received $ 600,000 a year to serve on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma from 2014 to 2019. Said
Wikipedia’s Joe Biden entry doesn’t even mention Hunter Biden’s laptop. The president’s son forgot his 2017 MacBook Pro laptop at a computer repair shop in Wilmington, Delaware in April 2019. The contents of the laptop were released, but Bidens and other Democrats claimed to be part of the “Russian Information Leakage Campaign.”The image above was found on a laptop
Even when former U.S. Navy soldier and hunter business partner Tony Boblinsky, a former wrestling champion, went to Fox News to help Trump and confirmed that he had an email confirming what was on his laptop. , The story was almost ignored.
Sanger said many Republicans use Wikipedia and are keen to read the article and create editors to balance the story.
But he argues that the site will not allow it.
“Many people are very motivated to participate in making articles more politically neutral, but they are not allowed,” Sanger said.
“It is very noteworthy given that the neutral policy is still in place.”
Sanger added: ‘If only one version of the facts is allowed, it gives wealthy and powerful people a great incentive to take control of something like Wikipedia and strengthen their power.
“And they do it.”
Sanger says Wikipedia resembles many media entities, and the controversial question seems to assume that there is only one legitimate, defensive, true version.
“Of course, that’s not the way Wikipedia used to be.”
“No one should trust Wikipedia,” warns co-founder Larry Sanger.
Source link “No one should trust Wikipedia,” warns co-founder Larry Sanger.