Texas

Movie set tragedy calls for a ban on guns

New York – In computer-generated images, the magical limits that Hollywood can create, the elaborate dystopian universe, seems to be the limits of the sky. A journey into space that is neither an astronaut nor a millionaire. An immersive journey into the future, or a return to a bygone era.

However, as the shocked and sad industry recalled this week, many works still use guns (real guns) when shooting. And, despite rules and regulations, people can be killed, as it happened when Alec Baldwin was handed a weapon and said it was safe and then fatally shot cinematographer Halyna Hutchins. There is sex.

Due to the tragedy, some people in Hollywood, along with incredible observers, asked: Why are real guns used in sets when computers can make gunshots in post production? Isn’t it unacceptable no matter how small the risk?

advertisement

For Alexi Hawley, that’s right. Executive Producer of ABC’s police drama “The Rookie” said in a staff memo on Friday that the events in New Mexico “shocked us all” and “any risk is too risky.”

He wrote in a memo, “There will be no more’living’weapons in the show.” First reported by The Hollywood Reporter and confirmed by The Associated Press.

Instead, he said, the policy is to use replica guns that use pellets instead of bullets and add a muzzle flash in post production.

Craig Zobel, director of the popular Kate Winslet drama “Mare of Easttown,” called for the industry to follow, using live rounds in previous films, but from that show. He said the gunshot was added after the shoot.

“There’s no reason to set a blank on a gun anymore,” Zobel wrote on Twitter. “It should be completely outlawed. Now we have computers. All” Mare of Easttown “ammunition is digital. You can probably say, but who cares? That is an unnecessary risk. “

advertisement

Cinematographer Bildir, who taught Hutchins, a rising star in her field at the American Film Institute, said, “There are readily available and inexpensive computer graphics about the old-fashioned practice of using real guns with blanks. Sometimes he expressed disgust. “

Dill, who holds credits such as “The Five Heartbeats” and “Dancing in September,” is at risk from a real gun because “people work long hours” and “exhausted” in the movie. He said it had increased.

“There is no excuse for using live weapons,” he said.

A petition was launched over the weekend on change.org calling for a ban on real guns from production sets.

advertisement

“There is no excuse for this to happen in the 21st century,” he said of the tragedy. “This isn’t the early 90’s when Brandon Lee was killed as well. Changes need to happen before the loss of additional talented life.” Of the martial arts legend Bruce Lee’s actor His son Lee was killed in 1993 by a makeshift bullet left on a prop gun after the previous scene.

The petition directly appealed to Baldwin to “use his power and influence” in the industry and promoted “Harina’s Law” banning the use of actual firearms. Currently, the US Federal Office for Workplace Safety is silent on this issue. And most production-loving states primarily use a hands-off approach.

advertisement

According to court documents, Hutchins, 42, was killed and Joel Souza was injured on Thursday in a set of “rust” in the west. Public Friday.

Soza was later discharged.

The tragedy came after some workers quit their jobs to protest the safety conditions and other production issues of the film, starring Baldwin and the producer.

In an interview, British filmmaker Steven Holl said he worked on “a lot of firearms” in Madrid this year.

“Rather than using blanks, we encouraged actors to use visual effects in post (production) to create the desired effect from a particular firearm and mimic the recoil from the gun. It works very well, “he said. ..

advertisement

However, he said special effects add cost to the production budget. “Therefore, it’s easier and probably more economical to actually use a blank to release a weapon in a set,” said a veteran cinematographer who worked on films such as “Fury” and “Tall: Dark World.” One hall says. But he said, “The problem with the blank is, of course … something is released from the gun.”

In addition to financial concerns, why is a real gun preferred? “Using blanks in the set has the benefits that some people want,” said Sam Dormer, a British “armorer” or firearms expert. “For example, you get a (better) response from an actor.”

Still, according to Dormer, the movie industry is likely to move away from real guns, albeit slowly.

The term “prop gun” can be applied to anything from rubber toys to real firearms that can fire projectiles. If it is used for firing, it is considered a real gun, even if it is blank. A blank is a cartridge that contains gunpowder but no bullets. Still, according to the Actors’ Equity Association, it can hurt or even kill people nearby.

advertisement

As a result, many also ban blanks and require the use of disabled or replica guns.

“There’s really no reason to put a blank on the set that day,” Liz Garbus wrote on Twitter. “CGI can make a gun look” real “. If you don’t have a CGI budget, don’t shoot the scene. “

Seattle-based filmmaker Megan Griffiths writes that he often gets pushbacks when he demands a non-firing weapon with a disability on the set.

“But that’s why,” she said on Twitter. “Misses happen, and when they contain guns, mistakes kill …. Muzzle flashes are the easiest and cheapest visual effect.”

“Why are we still doing this?”

___

Associated Press writers Lindsey Bahr, Lindsey Bahr in Los Angeles, Hiller Italy in New York, and Lizzy Night in London contributed to this report.

Copyright 2021 AP communication. all rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.

Movie set tragedy calls for a ban on guns

Source link Movie set tragedy calls for a ban on guns

Back to top button