Business

‘Morbius’ reviews: Spider-Man spin-off is bad

Jared Leto is Michael Morbius in Sony’s “Morbius.”

Sony

It’s never a good sign when a critic says your movie could be “better summed up in a two-minute trailer,” but alas, that’s the case with Sony’s latest Marvel movie “Morbius”.

As Adam Graham of the Detroit News says in his review of the film, the studio’s understanding of its Spider-Man story is understandable. However, without Disney’s steady hands, it looks like Sony is struggling to lift its evil from the comic page to the big screen.

Graham is not alone in the assessment of the film directed by Jared Leto. The film, which will be released on Friday, has received rave reviews overall and has recently been Rotten Tomatoes ’15%“ Fresh ”rating out of 168 reviews.

“Morbius is a pure, nonsensical attempt to remind viewers that Sony has the rights to these nasty Spider-Man paintings, and sadly, they will use them,” Kyle Anderson wrote in a review of the film. Nerdist.

Although both Venom films were theatrically successful for Sony, they were considered “Fresh” by Rotten Tomatoes, meaning they did not score 60% or higher on the site.

In the film, Leto portrays biochemist Michael Morbius trying to cure himself of a rare blood disease. However, when an experiment goes wrong, it accidentally infects itself with some kind of vampirism. While he is apparently recovering from his illness, gaining strength and speed, he also longs for blood.

He is reluctant to give in to his new desires, but his friend Milo, who had the same blood disease and took the same “cure,” enjoys his new power and has little doubt about what he needs to maintain his new form.

“‘ Morbius ’is not good,” Anderson wrote. “There are two ways. It feels lazy and unfinished.”

Sure, some critics saw the virtues in the film. “Morbius has a sense of place, and an interest in places of interest, that sets him apart from the bright, anonymous Atlanta pop of so many other superhero movies,” Richard Lawson wrote for Vanity Fair. Manohla Dargis of The New York Times applauded Leto’s “restraint, sensitivity, and gestural expressiveness.”

Beyond that, though, there aren’t many voices in favor of “Morbius.” Here’s what critics said about the film ahead of Friday’s release:

Kristy Puchko, Mashable

“‘ Morbius ’can be completely skipped,” writes Kristy Puchko in her review of the film for Mashable, which describes the film as “tiring” and so fast that it’s dizzying.

“Maybe the quick steps are to make up for the lack of interest in the actors, and many of them speak in a tired tone as if they’ve been dragged out of bed before filming, or maybe it’s hope if it’s an argument. It moves fast enough. to anticipate what is expected and in which two-dimensional character each character is, ”he wrote.

He also said that the costumes were “forgettable” and that the creature’s designs were “unbelievably spectacular” and that the computer-generated prostheses were “neither fresh nor scary.”

“Morbius”, which seemed to present itself as a thriller-inspired horror film, has nothing to do with it, Puchko said. He also warned that viewers should be distracted by their expectations for major connections to other Marvel entities.

“Don’t be fooled by trailers that mention Venom, shaking Spider-Man street art in the background and teasing Michael Keaton’s return as The Vulture,” he wrote. “Eddie Brock and his symbiote beast are only referred to as ‘that thing that happened in San Francisco,’ and as an inexplicable joke where Morbius identifies himself as ‘Venom.’ That’s it.”

Read Mashable’s full review.

Jared Leto is Michael Morbius in Sony’s “Morbius.”

Sony

Emily Zemler, Observer

“In 2004,‘ Morbius ’could have been a pretty good film,” wrote Emily Zemler in her review of the Observer film. “Today, the comic’s spin-off … feels outdated and pointless.”

“If this were the property of Disney Marvel Studios, instead of under the Sony umbrella, you’d see ‘Morbius’ this weekend at Disney +, in a limited series of six episodes, showing the origins of the evil that sucks pain and blood. instead of feeling compelled to pay for a big screen experience, ”he added.

Zemler pointed to the lack of special effects, saying that the version of the vampire prostheses he had seen in the “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” session at the beginning seemed to be wrong.

He also highlighted the lack of commitment. Drawing from the verbal events of the “Spider-Man: No Way Home” universe, Leto’s film is “a bit of a pin,” Zemler wrote.

“Unless your card is free, don’t worry,” he wrote. “This film is as inanimate as the bodies that Morbius drains and throws to the ground.”

Read the full Observer review.

Charlotte O’Sullivan, The Evening Standard

“It’s really ironic,” Charlotte O’Sullivan wrote in her review of “Even Morbius” for The Evening Standard. “There were rumors that Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield could appear in ‘Spider-Man: No Way Home’, but the actors and groups denied it.”

“No, no, no, they said. Fans shouldn’t expect any extra gifts. Then – that’s right! – there were plenty of sweets,” O’Sullivan continued. “With this Sony production, the third film from SSU (Sony’s Spider-Man Universe), director Daniel Espinosa implied that there can be sweets. And, yes, we get it. In ‘Morbius’, there was real applause. “

For O’Sullivan, the script was “more stupid than the second,” with little logic to match the leaps made in science or motivation. There is no character or close danger, and the love affair between Morbius and his girlfriend Martin does not burn.

“Although Morbius is endless, he also feels that large parts are missing,” O’Sullivan wrote. “It simply came to our notice then that the last fight was a lack of brilliance. It’s an insult. It gives. No. It makes sense. “

Read the full review of The Evening Standard.

Clarisse Loughrey, Independent

“In the middle of ‘Morbius’, in the middle of a movie about an evil Spider-Man who doesn’t play Spider-Man, I was ready to touch him,” Clarisse Loughrey wrote in a review of the film Independent for. “Get up and get away. To live in a Swiss alpine hut and just never deal with Sony’s Spider-Man-less Universe again. It’s too much effort, with too few rewards.”

Like many critics, Loughrey noted that “Morbius” serves as a prelude to a post-credit scene rather than a fully functional film. He called the film “tasteless” and “written in installments”, with “Morbius” not having a real ending, but a kind of ending.

“Overall,‘ Morbius ’is a more frustrating film than a hilarious one,” he wrote. “And if superhero movies are to dominate modern cinema over the next decade, or at least we should accept a healthy competition between studios. I hope that in the future, Sony will have a better fight than this.”

Read the full Independent review.

‘Morbius’ reviews: Spider-Man spin-off is bad

Source link ‘Morbius’ reviews: Spider-Man spin-off is bad

Back to top button