Meta faces a British lawsuit over allegations of exploitation

A UK legal expert has filed a £ 2.3 billion class proceeding against Facebook’s parent company Meta. The allegations are that the company has exploited its market advantage to generate billions of dollars in revenue from consumer data without compensation.

Dr. Liza Lovdahl Gormsen, a senior researcher at the Institute for International Comparative Law (BIICL), said she was making legal claims on behalf of 44 million UK users using Facebook between 2015 and 2019. Said.

The proceedings registered with the Competition Appeal Tribunal in London have been abused by Facebook by imposing unjustified conditions (necessary when signing up for social media platforms) on UK users and collecting personal data without appropriate compensation. Claims. The proceedings allege that these T & Cs and data collection constitute an “injustice price” for UK users to access the service under the competition law of 1998.

The proceeding was filed as an opt-out class action proceeding. That is, Facebook users in proceedings are automatically bound in proceedings unless they choose to opt out.

“Facebook has become the only social network in the UK in the 17 years since it was created, ensuring that we can connect with friends and family in one place,” said Dr. Lovdahl Gormsen.

“Still, Facebook had a dark side. Facebook abused its market advantage to impose unfair conditions on ordinary British people and empower them to misuse personal data.”

Meta uses profiles created by Meta by tracking user online activity to account for 98% of revenue from advertisers who can target specific consumers and demographics.

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, Lovdahl Gormsen’s leading law firm, has notified Meta of the complaint. The judge now hears the allegations and decides whether to continue the case. If permitted, it may take 6 to 12 months to complete.

In a statement Parents, A meta spokesperson said people are using the company’s services for their value. A spokeswoman added that the Meta platform gives users meaningful control over the personal data they want to share with whom.

“We have invested heavily in creating tools that allow them to do so,” a spokesman added.

This case is the latest in a series of legal challenges that Meta faces in different countries.

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently received permission to bring a company to court over antitrust law.

Last month, Rohingya refugees from Myanmar sued the company on allegations that the platform ignored inflammatory posts, ignored hate speech to ethnic groups, and led to the genocide of members in Southeast Asian countries.

Lawyers for victims of the 2017 slaughter and evacuation have begun collaborative legal action against British and US social media giants. They seek compensation of over £ 150 billion and are one of the largest group claims against victims of crimes against humanity.

In February 2021, a journalist filed a large-scale proceeding against Facebook in the London High Court for failing to prevent third parties from accessing the data of about one million users in the United Kingdom and Wales. I woke it up.

Peter Jukes said between November 2013 and May 2015 when Facebook allowed millions of users access to data without consent or prior knowledge of the third-party app “This Is Your Digital Life.” Claimed that his data had been compromised.

In March, Reporters Without Borders (Reporters Without Borders, or RSF) filed a proceeding against Facebook in France for allowing disinformation and hate speech.

Global Media Watchdog claimed that social media companies were unable to provide users with a “safe” online environment.

Meta faces a British lawsuit over allegations of exploitation

Source link Meta faces a British lawsuit over allegations of exploitation

Back to top button