Tech

Meet the police and buy retrospective facial recognition technology

The Mayor of London has approved a proposal to allow the Metropolitan Police Department to purchase and use retrospective facial recognition (RFR) technology to enhance surveillance.

The proposal, signed last month, describes a four-year contract worth £ 3,084,000 between the Mayor of London and Northgate Public Services, a subsidiary of NEC Corporation, which was recently acquired.

According to the mayor’s office, the Metropolitan Police Department will begin using RFR technology in the coming months to support investigations through face detection and matching.

“The Metropolitan Police Department (MPS) will benefit from the updated RFR search capabilities to enable more effective use of images and image frames from video data across all types of investigations,” the official document said. ..

The updated RFR feature allows MPS to process historical images from CCTV feeds, social media, and various other sources to identify and capture suspects.

“Technical advances made in recent years will enable previously unavailable MPS opportunities to support face detection and matching if seized,” the document states.

According to the report by WiredThe Mayor’s Office has set up an independent scrutiny group called the Metropolitan Police Department to review and advise the Metropolitan Police Department on the use of RFR.

A spokesperson for the Mayor of London said RFR technology would help reduce the time it takes to identify suspects and reduce crime in the capital.

However, critics are dissatisfied with this claim, warning that RFR technology is dangerously vulnerable, could intensify existing discrimination and would unacceptably violate people’s privacy. ..

Ella Jakubowska, policy adviser to the advocacy group European Digital Rights, said RFR technology “can curb people’s freedom of expression, rallying and their ability to live without fear.”

Since its inception, facial recognition technology has faced intense criticism from lawmakers and privacy advocates from various countries.

Opponents of technology cite multiple studies that have found that facial recognition systems suffer from racial, age, and ethnic prejudices that can lead to human rights violations.

They also argue that this technology can be an invasive form of surveillance.

In June, Elizabeth Denham, head of the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) in the United Kingdom, said she was “deeply concerned” about the improper and reckless use of live facial recognition (LFR) systems in public. rice field.

In recent years, the ICO has conducted several studies on planned applications of LFR technology and found problems with all of them.

None of the organizations involved in these investigations were able to fully justify the processing of people’s data, and none of the deployed systems were found to be fully compliant with UK data protection regulations. did not.

Last January, Met announced that LFR technology has passed the pilot phase and is ready for permanent integration into routine police. A month later, we began deploying LFT cameras in a location in London where serious criminals were expected to be found.

The Metropolitan Museum of Art claimed to have used police staff to fully test the system, and the results suggested that 70% of wanted criminals were identified when passing the camera. ..

Meet the police and buy retrospective facial recognition technology

Source link Meet the police and buy retrospective facial recognition technology

Back to top button