Texas

Martin Samuel: Novak Djokovic is a loser whether he wins the appeal or not

Ultimately, it’s a mess. It’s been almost a week now. Novak Djokovic is still a little closer to knowing if he will be a draw on Monday. It’s a little closer to knowing if he will be detained, deported, or defending his title.

It’s an inevitable, enlightening mess. Australia didn’t want him in Melbourne, and should have revealed it long ago. Instead, the host gave him a visa and almost immediately regretted it. Well, I’m here again. We will return to the black-filled van and return to Melbourne’s Federal Circuit and Family Court for further legal discussions in front of Judge O’Callahan.

However, it has not returned to the Australian Open. not yet. For now, Djokovic’s visa remains canceled, and Immigration Minister Alex Hawke hopes he succeeded where many enemies failed to expel Djokovic from the first Grand Slam of the year. ..

Novak Djokovic could detain, deport, or defend the Australian Open title next week

Djokovic will have his visa revoked on Friday and will spend the weekend at the detention center.

Djokovic will have his visa revoked on Friday and will spend the weekend at the detention center.

An interview was scheduled for Saturday at 8 am in Melbourne, and further proceedings were scheduled for Sunday at 9 am. As usual, Djokovic wouldn’t leave without a fight. But even his expensive legal team, led by Nick Wood SC, cannot guarantee this victory.

Australia gives the immigration minister almost absolute power, and the time Hawk spends reaching the decision to revoke Djokovic’s visa suggests a man who ensures all I and T dotted lines and intersections. And O.

But if Djokovic is destined to fight unwavering state power, remember who brought us here. Djokovic wanted to play in Australia but didn’t want to follow Australian rules. He was a truth-seeker and did not appear to be completely married to the truth. And he sought justice and the interests of society, and he reserved the right to act very willingly.

So it wasn’t a great week for governance, from borders to ministries, but even worse for the world’s best tennis player and self-appointed champion of the unvaccinated masses.

World No. 1 is determined not to give up the chance of a fightless Australian Open

World No. 1 is determined not to give up the chance of a fightless Australian Open

What Djokovic wanted would be seen as the collapse of his principle position, as many of his entry cases collapsed. He appeared publicly when he was supposed to enter the quarantine, his application said he did not travel when he contained a misleading anomaly even in his positive test in the analysis. The QR code can be negative or positive.

There seems to be some confusion on the date. Djokovic became a visitor trying to play the game because he looked like an innocent victim of Australia’s cold, faceless immigration system. Playing with his fame to get special treatment. And that looks terrible for the majority.

“What could this guy do anymore?” At the beginning of the week, he begged for sympathetic justice Kelly. Plenty, it happens. He may have been at home when he tested positive. He may have been wearing a mask. He was able to fill out his immigration form, or at least be responsible for overseeing it, so there were no mistakes in useful whereabouts information.

Best of all, like 97% of contemporaries, he could have been vaccinated as Australia demanded, or as far away as some. He chose another path, and that is the path that led us here.

Djokovic had the option of being vaccinated or leaving Australia (Photo: Serbs boarding a plane to Melbourne earlier this month).

Djokovic had the option of being vaccinated or leaving Australia (Photo: Serbs boarding a plane to Melbourne earlier this month).

The government’s mistake was not seeing what was coming. They endangered his presence dividing their community because they were unaware of the moment they made the most prominent anti-vaxxer exception on the planet. This is a conclusion that Minister Hawk seems to have finally reached, which Djokovic’s lawyer is going to go this weekend. After all, as discussed yesterday, there is no evidence that the antibacs community will be silent and unstable if Djokovic leaves the country.

The damage has occurred and it is almost certain that many will protest on his behalf. If anything, it may be argued, the best chance to keep peace is to keep him. Nothing is more certain to “stimulate anti-vax emotions” than deportation.

But it currently ignores the depth of emotions towards Djokovic. Protesters make a fuss, but it’s a silent majority at home, smoking. And these are the people that Prime Minister Scott Morrison needs to be reelected. The harm caused by Djokovic’s failure and the steady drip of deception, whether intentional or unintentional, is something he cannot ignore.

In any case, when Djokovic appears on the tennis court this week, he feels noisy. Furious Serbian asylum seekers and rebels, anti-vax protesters, and the majority of Melbourne on the other side. Even his famous gesture, which mimics him throwing his mind into the crowd, will look hostile to some while being positive after appearing in his public place. What is he sending: love or infection?

If Djokovic plays in next week's tournament, he can get angry at the stand

If Djokovic plays in next week’s tournament, he can get angry at the stand

As Hawk intended, there are many precedents for banning visitors in the name of order. David Icke is currently banned from Australia in comments believed to deny the Holocaust, but controversial American author Kent Hecken Livery and autism expert Polly. Tommy is both banned to promote views on vaccination.

The stupid Katie Hopkins was thrown out, publicly bragging about ignoring quarantine rules. Having found time to reject these promotional hungry people, I believe that Djokovic’s profile and views were first welcomed.

One fact remains. Shortly before yesterday’s hearing (in effect, a meeting about another meeting) was postponed, Judge Kelly said that Covid had physical and mental health and economics in the lives of people in Australia and around the world. He said it had a big impact on the surface.

Therefore, vaccination rules were a matter of public policy. This is why he wanted to hear the case in the High Court. But his words said much more. They talked about the anger felt against those who do not play fairly, those who endanger others, and those who want to live according to their own rules. Here’s the anger at number 10 of the party season. For the majority of Australians, the same selfishness is encapsulated in Djokovic.

Djokovic tried to play a good guy in his requip interview blunder-but made things worse

Djokovic tried to play a good guy in his requip interview blunder-but made things worse

Please explain to him about skipping the quarantine to attend an interview and photo shoot with the French sports newspaper L’Équipe, and not wearing a mask due to some interaction. Djokovic said he didn’t want to disappoint journalists. He played a good man.

But no sports writer or photographer on earth doesn’t understand the need to reorganize that engagement. No one refuses to accept the contract with Covid as the most legitimate reason to postpone it.

Journalists wore masks all year round and followed the arena’s yellow, green, and red zones to interview through Zoom. And Djokovic will know this. He would have seen tennis writers socially distant, he would know areas that were only for competitors, he zoomed in at home or in a distant media room. I talked to the people who work at.

It is immeasurable that a sense of duty forced him to meet the media while he could be infected with Covid. Serbian law at the time stipulated that he should be quarantined for 14 days. It is dangerous to claim that he kept his appointment from the goodness of his heart.

Against this backdrop, Djokovic will enter the third round in federal court on Sunday. Both sides are convinced of their case. Whether Djokovic wins or loses, in reputation he seems to be losing.

Martin Samuel: Novak Djokovic is a loser whether he wins the appeal or not

Source link Martin Samuel: Novak Djokovic is a loser whether he wins the appeal or not

Back to top button