House passes $ 1.9 billion to improve parliamentary security after riots

The passage comes the day after the House of Representatives approves the establishment of an independent committee to investigate the siege of the deadly mob.

Washington — Thursday’s House to strengthen the complex with retractable fences and quick reaction forces following the most violent domestic attacks on Congress after the Democrats pushed out Republican opposition after the January 6 rebellion. Approved $ 1.9 billion in a narrow sense. In history.

The passage of bill 213-212 is an independence investigating the siege of a deadly mob who fought police to attack a building by supporters of President Donald Trump who failed in an attempt to overturn the Democratic Joe Biden election. It took place the day after the House of Representatives approved the establishment of the committee.

The two measures are now facing uncertain consequences in the evenly divided Senate, as most Republicans opposed both and some Liberal Democrats opposed security funds.

Related: House vote to create a panel to investigate the January 6 Parliamentary riots

Related: 35 Republicans Support Trump, Return to Capitol Riot Committee on January 6

“We have major political parties in countries that are ignoring it — we are trying to solve the problem. They obviously don’t want to sit down and talk about it,” D-Ohio said. State Rep. Tim Ryan said. Budget subcommittee dealing with legislative security.

House Expenditure Committee Chair Rosa De Lauro recalled her experience of being trapped in a House gallery the day the attacker attempted to break in, and Parliamentary police told her to duck on the floor. Later, I called my husband and said it was okay.

“This bill isn’t about politics, it’s not about scoring,” De Lauro said. “It is to ensure that everyone who enters the Capitol is safe and protected.”

Some Republicans supported the bill, but most Republicans voted against it, arguing that it was too expensive and did not require fencing. Many of them said that money should be spent on border security, not on parliamentary security.

Republican Rep. Lance Gooden argued that Democrats should spend money on the walls “around this building in DC” rather than finishing the border walls Trump advocates.

Some Democrats also opposed the added security measures. “I wasn’t convinced of the importance of money,” Minnesota lawmaker Ilhan Omar said shortly before the vote.

During the months of its creation, the emergency spending package incorporates recommendations from an external panel of experts to enhance security after a violent mob attack.

Already, the National Guard has been protecting the building for months, and public access is severely restricted. The wire-covered fence of the razor that stood to remind us of the siege was removed, but the extended boundary fence remained, blocking access to the lush grounds popular with visitors. To do.

The bill includes the cost of new fences, either retractable or “pop-in,” to protect the site while removing the current boundaries. The law states that money cannot be used to install permanent ground fences, reflecting the desire of most members of Congress that the area should be open to the public.

Other improvements include increased security for windows and doors, new security entrances and cameras, and increased security at home and in Washington to protect members as the threat doubled last year. There is also money to prosecute the riots, protect the threatened federal judges, and repay the Capitol Police and other federal agencies on January 6 for their efforts.

The law renames the Parliamentary Police Wellness Program to Howard C. “Howie” Leven Good Wellness Center and adds Mental Health Counselors and Resilience Specialists for Trauma Support. Levengood was a parliamentary police officer who claimed his life shortly after the attack.

Some lawmakers opposed the proposal that the National Guard maintain a “quick reaction force” nearby. This is an effort to improve the response time after the National Guard had taken hours to arrive on January 6, as police officers had been severely beaten by the riots. ..

Key Republicans of the House and Senate Armed Services Commission oppose relying on the military to protect the Capitol. This is a feeling shared by many members who promoted the immediate reopening of the Capitol grounds.

Democrats also said they were worried about many of the military-like measures, but said they had few options other than protecting the building. The delay in sending security guards to the Houses of Parliament was due in part to the failure to contain the violence. Five people were killed, including a Trump supporter who was shot dead while trying to access a room in his house through a broken window, and a police officer who died after repelling the mob.

“We have never responded quickly to us here, you know, we have never rioted,” Ryan said. “Therefore, in order to try to solve some of these problems, we need to evolve our thinking.”

House passes $ 1.9 billion to improve parliamentary security after riots

Source link House passes $ 1.9 billion to improve parliamentary security after riots

Back to top button