Washington – A federal judge ruled Wednesday that House Democrats who spent years investigating Donald Trump are entitled to a portion of the former president’s financial records.
The ruling that Judge Amit Mehta of the US District Court in Washington empowered Congress to set records is the latest development in many years of legal and political skirmishes over Trump’s close financial access. However, given the expected appeal, it is unlikely to be the last statement on the matter. The US Supreme Court has already weighted it once.
At issue are requests from Democrats of the House Surveillance and Reform Commission, who summoned Trump’s accounting firm Mothers USA for records in 2019 and February last year.
In his order, Meta had previously set aside Trump’s challenge to the subpoena and allowed the Commission’s request for records to “progress without qualification,” but the Supreme Court’s opinion from 2020 is more. He wrote that he requested a new analysis in favor of restricted access. More records than what lawmakers originally wanted.
The opinion cited concerns about the separation of powers that Congress has the important power to demand the president’s personal information, but that it is not unlimited.
Applying the elements set by the High Court, Mehta wrote that the House of Representatives was entitled to a more limited section of Trump’s financial records.
Carolyn Maloney, a New York Democrat and chair of the committee, said in a statement: Conflicts of interest, interests, and unconstitutional violations. ”
“It’s a shame that the court has narrowed down the subpoena in some respects, even though it admitted that it served a valid legislative purpose, but the Commission is taking the next step forward,” Maloney said. We are considering it in a targeted manner. “
Separately, the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel said in a statement last month that the Treasury must provide the Houseways and Means Commission with a Trump tax return. The opinion said that the chairman of the committee “evoked a good reason to request tax information from the former president,” and under federal law “the Treasury must provide the committee with information.” Stated.
The Commission’s search for records overlaps with other records already published to investigators. For example, in 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of New York District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.’s request for Trump’s tax records, but the ruling kept the document out of the public eye. The Vence office owned those records in February.
Follow Eric Tucker on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/etuckerAP.
Copyright 2021 AP communication. all rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.
Homes entitled to Receive Part of Trump’s Financial Records
Source link Homes entitled to Receive Part of Trump’s Financial Records