Texas

Guardian’s View on US Abortion Law: Freedom Hanging in Threads | Editorial

NSThe U.S. Supreme Court’s announcement that a new Texas law banning abortion after six weeks is valid until hearing a federal lawsuit on November 1 prevents the court from attempting abortion of women. It was a blow to those who wanted to have the potential to do it. Constitutional right to abortion. The 1973 decision that established this right, the Roe v. Wade case, is a milestone in court history.

The challenge posed by the Biden administration aims to overturn Texas law because the state violated court authority. Texas lawmakers have “avoided the traditional mechanism of judicial review” by outsourcing abortion ban enforcement to civilians who have been allowed to sue women to help women obtain abortions since September. The lawsuit states that it has asked to “do.” The Justice Department argues that this is a dangerous precedent that could undermine other Supreme Court decisions. Some employers have offered to move their staff to other states, but the women most likely to be harmed by the ban are the poorest, the least traveled, and disproportionately colored women in Texas.

The court should have ruled in favor of the administration and should have taken the opportunity to tentatively block the law. By assembling their bans as they did, Texas legislators bravely gamed the system. Unlike other countries that limit abortion, there is no exemption for pregnancy or teenage girls due to rape or incest. Also, although there are no special provisions for fetal abnormalities, the 6-week post-conception limit (before knowing that many women are pregnant) is, in any case, fast enough to make such a diagnosis impossible. Thing. In the current situation in Texas, a $ 10,000 bounty can be sought if a vigilant filed a proceeding, making the state one of the most oppressive women’s reproductive rights jurisdictions in the world. I have.

No matter what happens next month, the stage for further conflict is already in place. In December, the Supreme Court hears another abortion case, Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. It challenged the ban on abortion after being imposed in Mississippi for 15 weeks in 2018, but was subsequently blocked. The case is a serious test, and it is widely expected that a conservative majority of courts, including three Trump appointees, will stand on the side of the state.

The Roe v. Wade case enshrines the right of a woman to have an abortion, now about 24 weeks pregnant, before the foetation can survive outside the womb. For decades, states against abortion have worked to undermine this right, and poor black women can be trapped in legislative traps designed to punish women whose pregnancy does not lead to childbirth. Much higher. Surprisingly cruel and unjustified consequences include the imprisonment of a miscarriage woman who prosecutors claimed to be related to substance use.

American women were at the forefront of feminist activity in the 1960s and 1970s. Increased reproductive freedom, including access to contraception and abortion, was one of the great benefits of the movement. Internationally, Argentina and Ireland are among the countries that have liberalized the law, and that trend continues rather than leaving women’s choices. However, the United States is exerting a great deal of influence and has already restricted foreign aid to abortion providers. The threat to women raised by the US Supreme Court goes far beyond Texas and Mississippi.

Guardian’s View on US Abortion Law: Freedom Hanging in Threads | Editorial

Source link Guardian’s View on US Abortion Law: Freedom Hanging in Threads | Editorial

Back to top button