The logo of Google, an American multinational technology company, found in Googolplex, Google’s headquarters complex, and its parent company, Alphabet Inc.
Alex Thai | SOPA Images | LightRocket | Getty Images
Judges are considering subpoenas in a nearly year-long case against Google’s workers, but former company employees have played their role in highlighting the intensifying tensions between the two. I’m playing.
Three former Google employees have filed a proceeding this week for dismissing them in protest of a cloud transaction signed by a former employer with the Trump administration’s Customs and Border Protection in 2019.
Rebecca Rivers, Sophie Waldman, and Paul Duke alleged that when they were hired by Google, they were asked to sign a contract that included the company’s tagline “Don’t Be Evil.” Plaintiffs say Google has violated the agreement and seek compensation and other remedies for suffering “significant damage to its reputation and ability to be rehired competently.”
Google’s parent company, Alphabet, has little reason to worry financially. The company’s balance sheet has more than $ 140 billion in cash equivalents and a market capitalization of approximately $ 1.9 trillion. However, a series of employee strikes, internal battles over how the company uses artificial intelligence technology, and proceedings related to employee treatment have long been proud of the culture of openness and inclusiveness. It puts a potentially serious burden on the company that brought it.
Last December, the U.S. National Labor Relations Commission filed a complaint against Google alleging that the company was illegally dismissed and monitored employees in retaliation for their union efforts. The trial has been suspended for the past two months while the judge is considering the subpoena, and it is unknown when it will resume.
Laurie Burgess, a lawyer representing a former employee who sued Google this week, partially intended the latest proceedings to act as “a reminder that this is still alive and kicking.” Said that.
A Google spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.
This week, NLRB judge Paul Bogas ordered Google to open more than 70 documents related to communication with IRI consultants, a labor-management affiliate. NLRB claims that IRI was adopted as part of Google’s anti-union efforts and was referred to as “Project Vivian” by legal documents.
Bogus issued a 13-page response stating that the company was “dishonest” and tried to misrepresent the classification of the document.
“My review has shown that the defendant has made significant simultaneous efforts to give this illegal third-party material a face-to-face look of privileged communication,” Bogus wrote. “Many of these documents are campaign materials or related to the development of IRI, which provides anti-union messaging and message amplification strategies and training tailored to the respondents’ workforce and news and social media environment. “
In January, Google employees gathered to form the Alphabet Workers Union, which now has more than 800 members. Currently accounting for less than 1% of the company’s total workforce, the union has demonstrated its willingness to speak out and be proactive. We helped Google workers employed by contract company Adecco. Adecco won the battle between the company and Google after returning to the data center’s bonus program for temporary workers.
“The union has definitely strengthened people’s determination to face the fight,” Ned McNally, a temporary worker at Google’s data center in Council Bluffs, Iowa, told The New York Times last month after the victory. Told.
look: Google postpones January’s return to work plan in Omicron
Former Google employee accused of abusing the company in the NLRB case
Source link Former Google employee accused of abusing the company in the NLRB case