Civil rights group Muslim Advocates has sued Facebook and top executives, including Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg, alleging that it misleads the public about the security of its social media platform.
The complaint filed in federal court in Washington, DC on Thursday Facebook has widely claimed to remove content that spits out hatred and incites violence, but Facebook claims to deceive legislators, civil rights groups, and the general public.
“This failure has amplified the amount of anti-Islamic hatred that attacks Facebook users, and the prevailing anti-Islamic hatred on Facebook presents major problems both online and in real life. “The lawsuit said.The alleged role played by former President Donald Trump and the militia groupLast year, he instigated a double murder in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
“Because car companies can’t exaggerate how safe their products are to grow sales, Facebook isn’t allowed to do so either. Muslim Advocate Legal Director Mary Bauer said in an interview with USA “They are lying about product safety to circumvent parliamentary restrictions and mitigate public and non-commercial concerns.”
For example, the case cites Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sandberg’s testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee in September 2018. We are more determined than our opponents and will continue to fight. If a malicious person attempts to use this site, it will be blocked. If your content violates Google’s policies, we’ll remove it. ”
Still a few months ago, Megan Squire, a computer science professor at Elon University, called a group called “Veterans for Islamic filth” for violating Facebook’s rules on inhuman speech, including comparisons with filth. I reported. Facebook refused to remove the content, the proceedings said.
Facebook said in an email statement Thursday: Rhetoric comes in many forms. We are investing in AI technology to eliminate hate speech and are actively detecting 97% of our removals. “
Whether or not the proceedings have legal benefits, one scholar states that the proceedings highlight a nasty pattern.
“Apart from legal expertise, Muslim advocacy proceedings launched anti-Islamic attacks and interracial, despite repeated pledges by Facebook, unless coerced by Congress or courts. It reminds us that we will continue to provide shelter for the hatred groups that incite the conflict. We will reduce hate speech. ”
Activists have spent years doing more to remove content that is harmful to Facebook and other social media companies, especially after the deadly parliamentary riots in January. , Says private meetings and public pressure campaigns have had little success. In December, 30 Democrats in the US House of Representatives wrote a letter urging Facebook to remove anti-Islamic content. This was after 15 Democratic senators made similar charges on social networks last month.
Where did all the chips go? :The shortage of microchips explained: how it affects car prices and the tech industry
“Boom Boom Pow”:What is Xupermask? Will.i.am is launching a $ 299 high-tech Bluetooth-enabled face mask.
Facebook and other social media companies have broad discretion over how to crack down on content, and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protects them from liability. These protections fall short of misrepresenting how secure their platform is, Peter Rommer Friedman, a lawyer representing Islamic advocates, told USA Today.
“This is a very cautious strategy by Facebook, convincing the public that their products are safe, or at least trying to make them safe, and regulators enforce laws or adopt new laws. I think it discourages us from taking further steps to do so, which will make Facebook more responsible, “Romer-Friedman said.
Facebook, Zuckerberg complain of hate speech, violence against Muslims
Source link Facebook, Zuckerberg complain of hate speech, violence against Muslims