Durham probe: Ex-FBI officers plan to stand trial Sussmann, as the defense plans to discuss a criminal trial.

NEWYou can listen to Fox News articles!

James Baker, the former FBI attorney general, is expected to appear again Thursday morning in the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia as part of Michael Sussmann’s trial to continue questioning. From the company of Special Counsel John Durham and the defense.

The government is expected to call former FBI officers Bill Priestap and Trisha Anderson to stand for questioning.

Priestap served as the FBI’s assistant director of counterintelligence from 2015 to 2018. Anderson is the department’s chief adviser on national security.

Fox News reported earlier this year that Priestap had testified before a grand jury held in the form of a lengthy Durham trial on the basis of the Trump-Russia trial.

FBI attorney James BAKER testified that he did not go to get SUSSMANN: this is not my investigation, it is you.

James Baker, who served as an FBI attorney, will leave office in 2018.
(FBI official photo)

Sussmann’s defense, late Wednesday, signaled his intention to plead guilty Thursday morning – a request from U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper, who is presiding at the court, he said he “did not want” to give.

Sussmann’s attorney, Sean Berkowitz, on Wednesday said he planned to argue the case on Friday, following a return from questioning and the presentation of major counsel. or Clinton campaign Marc Elias.

Sometime during the defense interrogation, Elijah was asked if Sussmann went to the FBI in September 2016 with information showing a secret communication route between Donald Trump and the Alfa Bank of Russia in the name of Hillary Clinton’s announcement.

“I think you should ask Mr. Sussmann,” Elias said.

The lawsuit later challenged Sussmann’s response – an act that the defense said violated Sussmann’s rights.

Cooper said Wednesday that the defense “needs to be ready to work with witnesses [tomorrow]and he says he “doesn’t want to give offense.”

Meanwhile, the government is expected to begin Friday by questioning Baker, who has fallen to the center of the trial.


Sussmann was charged with making a false statement to the FBI when he told Baker in September 2016, less than two months before the presidential election, that he would not work “for any customer.” at his request and attended a meeting where he reported. “The alleged data and the‘ white papers ’revealed a secret way of talking” between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which has ties with the Kremlin.

The Durham company said Sussmann has done the work for two clients: advertising Hillary Clinton and a technology director, Rodney Joffe. After the meeting with Baker, Sussmann criticized Hillary Clinton for her actions.

Sussmann admitted that he was not guilty of the crime.

Baker first took the stand Wednesday evening, explaining the 2016 meeting that Sussmann had earlier requested via email to his personal phone in Sept. 18, 2016.

Bill Priestap, assistant director of the FBI's counterintelligence division, testified during a Judiciary Committee meeting on the controversy between Russia and the Trump campaign.

Bill Priestap, assistant director of the FBI’s counterintelligence division, testified during a Judiciary Committee meeting on the controversy between Russia and the Trump campaign.
(Reuters, File)

Durham, instead of leaving weeks before the trial, referred to these emails, saying “the night before the defendant’s meeting with the lawyer “In fact, the defendant told various lies in writing and sending these emails to the attorney general. personal phone number.”

DURHAM releases former CLINTON Attorney MICHAEL SUSSMANN, who introduced ‘Lie in Writing’

Baker said he forgot to text and got it in response to a request from the government earlier this year. Baker said in March that Durham had asked him to “search” for emails and other conversations he had with Sussmann.

“I’m not out to get Michael and this isn’t my trial, it’s you,” Baker said in the complaint. “No one asked me to go find this before that.”

Baker testified that he had received the emails, told the government through his lawyer “as soon as I could,” and the FBI said “come to my house” that evening.

John Durham and Michael Sussmann.

John Durham and Michael Sussmann.
(Perkins Coie)

Baker described his relationship with Sussmann, saying they were “friends” who had always maintained the relationship, but said he was “a little surprised” at the availability of the texts.

DURHAM-SUSSMANN CONCLUSION: The judge ‘did not intend’ to confess the crime, despite the trial from the defense.

“I was a little surprised to get it from Michael, kind of thought I had my personal phone number, but Michael was a friend so he didn’t intimidate me,” Baker explained. “I trust Michael, it seemed to me at the time that he was very important and so I thought I would meet him soon.”

The government will give the letters to the jury for consideration on Wednesday.

The email said: “Jim – Michael Sussmann. My time is important (and easy) for me to communicate,” the email said, according to Durham. “Do you have time for a brief meeting tomorrow? I’m coming on my own – not as a customer or business – wanting to help the Bureau. Thank you.”

Baker said, “Yes. I will have some time. What are you going to do?”

Sussmann replied: “Every now and then but for lunch you call it that.”

“2:00 pm in my office? Do you have a clue or do you want help getting into the house?” Baker replied.

“I have a sign. Please remind me of your room #,” Sussmann said.

SUSSMANN-DURHAM THE PROSECUTOR: Attorney CLINTON said the FBI used it to create an ‘OCTOBER SURPRISE’ against TRUMP.

Baker explained Wednesday that he thought Sussmann would get a clue to put him in the FBI headquarters because of his frequent work with law enforcement and law enforcement.

The Durham team, in its opening remarks on Tuesday, argued Sussmann’s case was a matter of “necessity.”

“The right of a lawyer who thinks he can deceive the FBI without consequences; the right of a lawyer who thinks that the common law does not apply,” state prosecutors argued in a statement. Side of the government.

The government has argued that taking “serious complaints” to the FBI, “Sussmann avoided the usual procedures and went directly to the FBI’s top attorney,” Baker said.

Durham probe: Ex-FBI officers plan to stand trial Sussmann, as the defense plans to discuss a criminal trial.

Source link Durham probe: Ex-FBI officers plan to stand trial Sussmann, as the defense plans to discuss a criminal trial.

Back to top button