The judge ordered the Department of Justice (DOJ) to submit an internal memo from March 2019. Attorney General Bill Barr at the time cited former President Trump as a reason not to prosecute him for obstruction of justice after Mueller’s investigation.
The memo concludes that the evidence gathered by a team of special counsel Robert Swan Mueller investigating evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election does not support Trump’s sabotage charges.
“It’s time for the public to see it,” Amy Berman Jackson, a district judge, said in a ruling released Tuesday.
A portion of the memo was released on March 24, 2019, but DOJ has been sued by the Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW) for two weeks to release the full memo. There is a grace period. The DOJ previously claimed that this document was the private advice of an attorney made before a formal decision was made and was exempt from public record law under attorney / client privileges. It was.
However, Jackson has obscured the “true purpose of the memorandum” by the Justice Department, and the document produced by the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) contains “strategic rather than legal” advice. Said. She said the document was not “predetermined,” as both the OLC and the recipient of the document were already aware of the pre-determined results and the department maintained.
Federal Judge Slams AG Bar vows to consider irrelevant versions of Muller’s report
“A review of the document reveals that the Attorney General was not subsequently involved in the decision on whether the president should be prosecuted for obstruction of justice. The fact that he was not prosecuted was given. “Jackson said in a dated order. Monday.
“Not only was the Attorney General dishonest at the time, but the Justice Department was not unique to this court regarding the existence of the ruling,” said Jackson, who was appointed to the Federal District Court in Washington, DC by former President Obama. I made a good decision. Create a process that should be protected by careful process privileges. ”
In March 2019, Barr reportedly wrote to Congress, summarizing the conclusions before Mueller’s investigation was publicly announced, and removing Trump’s obstruction of justice.
Read the full letter
The moment was almost complete evidence for Trump, who repeatedly tweeted that he did not collude with the Russians in a torrent of suspicions from the media and politicians. Mueller said his report did not “exempt” Trump’s obstruction, but Barr said, “The report does not recommend further prosecution, and the special counsel has not yet been published. I didn’t get prosecution. “
Mueller later complained that Bar’s summary did not fully capture his findings, leading to “national turmoil.”
According to Barr’s letter, “The special counsel did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone else involved had colluded or coordinated with the Russians who engaged in these hacking activities,” Barr’s letter said. Despite multiple offers from Russian officials to support the Trump campaign. “
Click here for the FOX News app
Mueller did not find enough evidence to prosecute anyone in the Trump campaign for a criminal plot. Justice Department bars and officials have determined that evidence of obstruction is inadequate. According to Barr’s letter, Mueller “recognized” that the lack of evidence that Trump was involved in the collusion undermines any sabotage that relies on showing corrupt intentions by the president.
The Associated Press and Fox News’ Gregg Re contributed to this report.
DOJ orders Trump’s obstruction of justice to be turned over
Source link DOJ orders Trump’s obstruction of justice to be turned over