Democrats see “no reason to wait” in the Supreme Court vote

WASHINGTON – Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson has begun courting Capitol Hill senators, demanding confirmation of private meetings as Democrats worked to move her through the Senate within weeks.

Senate Democrats, concerned about their small 50-50 majority – Vice President Kamala Harris breaks the tie – announced Wednesday that Jackson’s hearing will begin on March 21, just three weeks after President Joe Biden nominated her to replace retired Judge Steve. Briar. For confirmation in April, they used Judge Amy Connie Barrett’s quick confirmation before the 2020 presidential election as a model for Jackson, who will be the first black woman to serve as a judge in the court’s 200-year history.

Senate Judge Dick Durbin called the process of swift confirmation of the “modern standard” on Wednesday after meeting with Jackson in his office, while acknowledging that part of the reason for the fast schedule was his party’s poor retention in the Senate .


“There’s no reason to wait,” Durbin said, although Breyer said he would not leave the bench until the summer. He noted that the commission was also aware of Jackson, who had just been confirmed as a judge of the Court of Appeals last year and had been confirmed by the Senate twice before.

The accelerated schedule is just a by-product of heightened partisanship and a decade of gradual rule changes in the former collegiate Senate. The majority party knows that it can win confirmation by a simple majority, and the bipartisan scope is more symbolic than necessary. While the Senate once took up to two months to reconsider cases and credentials before questioning a candidate, Republicans held hearings just two weeks after Barrett’s nomination to replace the late liberal icon Ruth Bader Ginsberg as the presidential election approached.

The senators will have a little more time to review Jackson’s record, but not much.

There was little backlash from Republicans, who confirmed Barrett and two other judges, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Cavanaugh, while they controlled the Senate and President Donald Trump was in office. Although few Republican senators are expected to vote for Jackson and few doubt she is too liberal, they are not spending much political energy to oppose her.


Texas Sen. John Cornin, a member of the party’s Judicial Committee, said, “I don’t think there’s much mystery,” because Jackson is not new to the committee.

“Given the fact that it will not change the balance, the ideological balance of the court, I think people will be respectful and take due care and ask questions, but I think we all have a pretty good idea what the outcome will be. it probably will be, unless there’s a big surprise, “Cornin said.

So far, there have been few surprises with Jackson, who has been a federal judge for nine years and is much liked by members of both countries.

After his own meeting with Jackson, Senate Democrat leader Chuck Schumer said the Senate would move her nomination “fairly but expeditiously.”

He told reporters about the nominee, saying she was an “optimistic person” trying to see all sides of the issue. He said they talked little about her judicial philosophy, but mostly about her life and her family.


“You can see when you meet her that she has real empathy,” Sumer said. “I think it’s very important in the judge, because you have two sides that clash on any issue, to be able to sympathize and walk in the other person’s shoes.”

Jackson also met with Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell and Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, the best Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Referring to the heated guerrilla battles for the three Trump nominees, especially Cavanaugh, Grassley told reporters before the meeting that Republicans would treat Jackson with “dignity and justice, and most importantly in depth.”

Traditionally, the hearings will last four days this month, with introductory statements on March 21 and testimony and interrogations over the next two days. The fourth day will include the testimony of external witnesses.

Biden spoke about Jackson and honored Briar in his speech on the state of the union on Tuesday night, calling the nominee “one of the best legal minds in our nation who will continue the legacy of Judge Briar’s excellence.”


In addition to her time as a federal judge, Jackson, 51, once worked as one of Breyer’s lawyers and served on the U.S. Penal Code, the agency that develops federal sentencing policy.

Biden said she was a “consensus-maker”, noting her work as a private court and as a federal public defender, and said she came from a family of public school teachers and police officers.

While Democrats can win Jackson’s confirmation without Republicans, assuming the group is strong and secure, they still hope to win some Republican votes. Durbin said he was working to that end, predicting there could be “about half a dozen” Republican votes.

Only Senator Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Markowski of Alaska and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina voted to confirm Jackson before the Court of Appeals last year. While Collins seemed open to voting for Jackson again, Mrkowski said in a statement last week that her previous vote did not mean she would support it this time.


Graham insisted on a different candidate from his home state, Federal Judge J. Michelle Childs, and expressed disappointment that she was not elected by Biden.

Sumer said Jackson was a person who should address all parties, noting her past as a public defender and support from some police groups, for example.

He said he hoped that when Republicans met her, “they will be as amazed as I was. She is an amazing person. ”

Copyright 2022 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Democrats see “no reason to wait” in the Supreme Court vote

Source link Democrats see “no reason to wait” in the Supreme Court vote

Back to top button