How much longer will we close to the inappropriate behavior of Prince Charles, who has not adapted to a king?
Over the years, the closer the heir’s allies approach the throne, the more consciously they will shape and reduce the most controversial aspects of their behavior.
Unfortunately, growing evidence makes it clear that anyone with half a brain is not like that.
If anything, Charles’s behavior is increasingly inappropriate as his mother enters the dark years of her spectacular and historic reign.
As a proud monarchist who firmly believes that the royal family should be more politically neutral and white than white, I am concerned about what might happen to the queen’s death (hopefully and for many years to come).
In the last fortnight alone, we have seen Charles’s government’s controversial but, in my opinion, intervention with a sensible and humane plan to bring some illegal immigrants to Rwanda in a major effort to stop the plague of human traffickers.
In an astonishing intervention, The Times was told that the Prince of Wales described the scheme as “horrific” in private interviews just hours after the government won the Supreme Court case designed to stop the deportations.
The leaks of this statement, probably by the prince’s allies, suggest that Charles has learned nothing over the years as to why it is essential to keep his naughty, naive, and idealistic beak out of sensitive political debates.
The Prince of Wales shook hands with Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad Bin Jassim al Thani at a 2013 meeting at his headquarters in Doha, Qatar. The former Qatar prime minister, the Sunday Times newspaper, approved large donations of three million euros. reported
The newspaper said the prince had personally accepted donations to the Prince of Wales Charity Fund from 2011 to 2015 from 2007 to 2013 by Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim, the Prime Minister of Qatar.
A source told the newspaper: “He said he was more than disappointed with the policy. He said he thought the whole approach of the government was horrible. It was clear that he was not impressed with the government’s move.”
And the office of Prince Clarence House did not deny that Charles disagreed with the policy, but insisted that it “remains politically neutral.”
If you believe that, you will believe that Meghan Markle is a selfless charity campaign.
Charles’s intervention was soon delayed, an extraordinary report in yesterday’s Sunday Times revealed that our next king had pocketed millions of euros from a former Qatari prime minister and taken the money in 500-euro banknotes from a meeting not in Fortnum & Mason’s bags . the assistants were there.
if true, this astonishing revelation alone raises so many questions about the morality and meaning of Prince Charles that it is difficult to understand that this man will soon be in charge.
I mean, what the hell was he thinking?
According to the report, which Clarence House also did not deny, Charles received a total of 3 million euros to keep former Qatari prime minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani, his nickname HBJ, in his bank account. The Prince of Wales Charity Fund, which is responsible for funding his Scottish property and other pet projects.
While it can’t be suggested that the payments were illegal, they seem immoral and raise big questions about the culture of getting money that works around our future head of state, especially since a close aide to Charles’s last year earned him a formal honor after the bombing. For a Saudi millionaire.
The Prince of Wales addressed the guests at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Dinner, he and Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Kigali, Rwanda, at the Marriott Hotel last week.
The Sunday Times reported that one of Charles’ advisers, who was in charge of taking care of some of the money, said “everyone felt very uncomfortable with the situation.”
But the problem with queens is that helpers often don’t want or can’t challenge their royal paymaster.
The Charity Commission is considering launching an investigation, which would be very embarrassing for the prince.
I find it particularly ironic that Saint Charles, who is morally opposed to the Rwandan scheme, seems so ready to deal with the Qatari regime, which deals with horrific human rights violations, including persecution of homosexuals, migrant workers and women. .
It’s amazing to me that Charles still has an insatiable thirst for money, even though he thinks his fundraiser is for decent reasons.
Surely the small fortune he receives from the Duchy of Cornwall is enough?
Worryingly, I’m afraid Prince William will start taking his perfect grandmother from his father.
He recently kidnapped a Queen’s Platinum Jubilee concert at Buckingham Palace to broadcast ecological catastrophe pornography.
While protecting the environment is a very important issue, and I, as an environmentalist since I was a child, believe that it needs serious attention, it is a delusion to suggest that it is not a political issue.
The Duchess of Cornwall joined Prince Charles on stage in her speech for the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee. He thanked her for being on the side of the nation in good times and bad for 70 years
The rush that the UK has taken to Net Zero, much faster than the equivalent of western democracies, will hit working class families in the pocket and I think it will become a defining problem against a system like Brexit in the coming years.
I would even go so far as to say that the Queen’s admiration and respect is almost universal, largely because she does not warn us of our immediate demise at every opportunity.
Our monarchs should represent hope, positivity, and support in times of crisis, and should not fall into the trap of hysterical and politicized hyperbole, even in passion projects that they believe are part of their power.
Charles has achieved everything he wanted before the Queen’s death, especially with his mother’s unthinkable confession that Camilla will become his ex-Queen Queen.
It’s time to grow up, hire some adults who will confront him the next time he proposes to stop student politics and carry a million dollars in a suitcase from a questionable foreign leader.
This is no longer a side show of scandal, as the very survival of the monarchy is at stake.
Charles, most of us are ready to succeed, but as it stands, you are achieving this tremendously.
DAN WOOTTON: I’m beginning to question Prince Charles’ ability to be king
Source link DAN WOOTTON: I’m beginning to question Prince Charles’ ability to be king