Washington – President Joe Biden seems ready to pass the May 1 deadline to complete the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, without saying immediately. An orderly drawer takes time, and Biden runs out of it.
Biden was so close to the deadline that his decision was mostly to postpone the withdrawal of the remaining 2,500 troops for at least a few months and continue to support Afghan troops at the risk of the Taliban’s backlash. equal. As Biden himself suggested in late March, removing all troops and their equipment in the next three weeks will be logistically difficult, along with coalition partners who cannot escape on their own.
“It will be difficult to meet the May 1 deadline,” he said. “It’s hard to get rid of those troops just for tactical reasons,” he added, “and if we leave, we’ll do so in a safe and orderly way.”
Former Admiral James Stavidis, who was NATO’s commander-in-chief from 2009 to 2013, said it was unwise to escape immediately at this point.
“Sometimes it’s a decision not to make a decision, but this seems to be the case with the May 1 deadline,” Stavidis said in an email exchange Wednesday. “The most cautious course of action feels like a six-month extension and an attempt to ensure that the Taliban truly meet their promises. In essence, a legitimate” conditional “withdrawal in the fall. Allow. “
Biden has a cross current of pressure. On the other hand, he said that for many years, Afghanistan would be better treated as a small anti-terrorism mission, including when President Barack Obama ordered a major expansion of the U.S. military, including during his time as Vice President. I have insisted. Since then, the opposition to Russia and China has emerged as a higher priority.
Meanwhile, current and former Army officers argue that leaving the Taliban in a relatively strong position and the Afghan government vulnerable is at risk of losing what it has gained in 20 years of combat. are doing.
“The withdrawal will not only leave the United States more vulnerable to the threat of terrorism, but will also have a devastating effect on Afghanistan and the region and will not benefit key stakeholders, including the Taliban.” The Afghanistan Study Group concludes with a February report. The group, whose co-chairman and retired General Joseph Dunford is a former U.S. military commander in Afghanistan and former co-chairman chairman, recommended that Biden extend the deadline beyond May. With some kind of agreement by the Taliban.
If the army stays, Afghanistan will be in Biden’s war. His decision, now and in the coming months, could determine the legacy of the 2001 US aggression designed in response to al-Qaeda’s September 11 attack, a militant led by Osama Bin Laden. The group used Afghanistan as a shelter.
Biden could maintain anti-terrorism forces in Afghanistan if elected during the 2020 campaign, but said he would “responsibly end the war” so that the U.S. military would never have to return. Stated. Peace talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government, which began last fall, are seen as the best hope, but have had little success so far.
Postponing the withdrawal of the United States carries the risk that the Taliban could resume attacks on the United States and the Allies, exacerbating the war. In a February 2020 agreement with the Donald Trump administration, the Taliban will stop such attacks and negotiate peace with the Afghan government in exchange for the U.S. commitment to a complete withdrawal by May 2021. Agreed to.
When he entered the White House in January, Biden knew the impending deadline and had time to meet it if he chose to do so. It became a sudden logistical hurdle simply because he postponed the decision to support long-term consultations within the administration and with allies. Under the potential threat of Taliban resistance, it is not technically impossible to fly thousands of troops and their equipment from Afghanistan in the next three weeks, but Biden violates his promise not to hurry. Looks like it is.
Biden reviewed the February 2020 agreement shortly after taking office, saying Tuesday’s aide was still thinking about moving forward in Afghanistan. White House spokesman Jen Psaki emphasized that May 1 is a deadline set by the previous administration and the decision is complex.
“But that’s also an important decision. He needs to work closely with our allies and the national security team of this administration,” said Mr. Pusaki. “And we want to give him time to do it.”
At a briefing on Afghanistan, Biden had heard from military commanders such as General Frank Mackenzie of the U.S. Central Army, who publicly reiterated that the Taliban had not fully fulfilled the promises made in the February 2020 agreement. Let’s go. Mackenzie et al. State that the level of violence is too high to provide a lasting political solution.
Congress was cautious about reducing the US military presence in Afghanistan. Last year, the Pentagon explicitly banned the use of funds to reduce troops of less than 4,000, but after Trump lost the election and ordered a reduction to 2,500, the Pentagon Anyway, I went ahead. Trump circumvented the legal ban by signing a waiver.
Copyright 2021 AP communication. all rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.
Biden seems ready to expand U.S. military presence in Afghanistan
Source link Biden seems ready to expand U.S. military presence in Afghanistan