AI prejudice and discrimination abundant: Australian Greens wants to abolish online safety bill

Senator Nick McKim, co-deputy leader of the Australian Greens, said the online security law pending by his party to take into account many concerns raised during a brief consultation on the bill but not addressed. He told the Senate that he wanted to withdraw. And scrutiny period.

Above all Online Safety Bill 2021 Extends eSafety Commissioner’s cyber removal capabilities to adults, empowering content-hosting services and end users responsible for malicious content to issue removal notifications directly.

TheĀ· Online Safety (Provisional Provisions and Consequent Amendments) Bill 2021In the meantime, it will be abolished Strengthening of 2015 Online Safety Act At the start of a new online safety law.

Mr McKim, like many others, said the government “pushed these bills through this parliament without careful consideration and scrutiny.”

The bill was submitted to Parliament on February 24, eight business days after discussions on the bill were completed, before the 400 submissions to the consultation were published. It was submitted to the Senate Committee on February 25, and after one hearing, the committee, which scrutinized the content, submitted the report.

Mr McKim also moved the government to “swipe the bill quickly and quietly” and exempt the bill from the usual requirements that regulate the time it takes to submit a bill for debate in the Senate.

“And, as an example of a vulgar haste run by the government, these bills were so rushed that the government needs to use amendments to correct typos in the original bill,” he said. Addressed in the Senate on Wednesday.

“Therefore, these bills aimed at protecting people from cyberbullying, cyber-abuse, non-consensual sharing of intimate images, and violent and radical material (for commendable purposes) have made this place. I’m in a hurry. “

The typo that McKim mentioned was the misspelling of “bullying.”

The original bill did not have a complaint mechanism. After that, the eSafety Commissioner was instructed to stand up, and some corrections were made.

“In a sense, Congress is being asked to sign a blank check for creating that process. I’m standing here today to discuss the bill, so I know what the eSafety Commissioner will do. Because there is no possibility. Establish. “

He also said that her successor may not behave in the same way, simply because the incumbent commissioner may be trusted not to abuse her next radical force.

“It is the duty of Congress to ensure that legislation is enacted with a clear focus on the need to ensure that protection exists beyond the incumbent of a particular person, not just that particular person in a particular position. It should be. In a particular position. “

The Greens weren’t just concerned with the rushing nature of the bill. It also raises concerns about potential biases from algorithms devised to address the requirements of the bill.

“The bill will inevitably lead to online platforms that rely on automated processes based on algorithms and artificial intelligence to identify and remove potentially penalizing content,” he said.

“The use of AI and algorithms in similar situations in places like the United States is highly controversial, to say the least. The use of these technologies, if not otherwise, is totally banned. I am concerned that it may lead to such disproportionate results. Commissioner’s intention. “

The use of algorithms and AI also risks incorporating racial prejudice into the regulation of Australia’s online content ecosystem, McKim said.

“We know it’s a risk, because it happened in the United States under exactly the same controversial law,” he said.

Discrimination will also face workers in the sex industry, he said.

“We are concerned about unintended consequences that can harm both sex workers, adult businesses, and the wider community,” he said. “Under the bill, as the Scarlet Alliance claims, sex workers are more vulnerable because they may lose access to income security tools, strategies, and connections with key peers, and the bill is the largest. We are also concerned that we did not provide it to promote our safety, and the privacy protection they can do.

“Greens absolutely praises the defined purpose of these bills to keep women’s children and Australia’s wider community safe in an online environment … but by trampling on other rights, a pair. You need to avoid protecting your rights. “

He said that Bills is so important and problematic that complex things should be thoroughly and properly scrutinized.

“And that’s unfortunately what the government is trying to deny.”

Invoice details

Protecting Women in the Cloud: eSafety wants online safety legislation to do just that

The Commissioner said that much of the online abuse is rooted in misogyny and aims to silence women’s voices. She hopes that the new online security law will somehow proceed to prevent such abuse.

Australia’s eSafety and the difficult battle to regulate the ever-changing online territory

The eSafety Commissioner is responsible for advocating online safety legislation, protecting vulnerable people and providing safe products to social media platforms, much like automakers and food producers are in the offline world. I’m talking about letting you do it.

eSafety prepares for online safety legislation with A $ 3 million software pilot and 20 new staff

The eSafety Commissioner is only able to respond to 72 of the 3,600 adult cyber-abuse complaints it receives and hopes that the new online safety law will allow it to do even more.

AI prejudice and discrimination abundant: Australian Greens wants to abolish online safety bill

Source link AI prejudice and discrimination abundant: Australian Greens wants to abolish online safety bill

Back to top button